2009 March Archive

Archive for March, 2009

60 years of conflict summed up in one sentence

Digg This !

LA Times has a very interesting though touchy article about Israel and Gaza, by Ben Ehrenreich.

I stumbled upon one sentence that summed up what I think, feel about the conflict:

“Founding a modern state on a single ethnic or religious identity in a territory that is ethnically and religiously diverse leads inexorably either to politics of exclusion (think of the 139-square-mile prison camp that Gaza has become) or to wholesale ethnic cleansing. Put simply, the problem is Zionism.”

The list of ethnic cleansings of the 20th century is impressive. Not much to add…

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Fire in the streets

Digg This !

Long time ago, I had time to do some photography around New York. A friend of mine asked me about good night photography cameras, and my answer was patience and a tripod.

Here is a series I shot four years ago called “Fire In The Street”.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Inspiring pictures from Ellen Kooi

Digg This !

Thanks to a Fubiz article, I discovered Ellen Kooi, a Dutch photographer with very inspiring/inspired work.

Below are some pictures.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Twitter is no search engine

Digg This !

I had a discussion yesterday with my friend Michael about the future of twitter and their potential positioning. It’s funny that it was relayed this morning in a Techcrunch article.

Why would I bother?

First of all, I’m not a twitter fan. I use it personally, and so far I’ve been using it as a communication tool. I do it because I want to stay on top, and reach an audience that is beyond (besides?) my personal audience.

But all of my friends are on Facebook, and all of them update their Facebook Status. Even when they use Twitter more than their Facebook status, they update their Facebook Status via Twitter (like @ceonyc, @cyrillamblard, @danielito, …).

And finally, until now, nothing has been easier to follow a conversation than Facebook: you can comment it, you’re notified when someone answers, you see a clear thread of conversations.

I don’t see how this specific usage of Twitter, even now that it reached a critical mass, could make it a search engine. How can “@so-and-so Yes man, you rock, loved that article but @thingamajig sucked last night” constitute the raw data for a search engine?

But …

But I also use Twitter for CabEasy. CabEasy allows taxi users to share cab rides, and each time they create a cab ride, they can tweet it. In addition, I’ve been using twitter to “source” the market and contact people who were looking to share a cab ride … with twitter. When I started doing that, I realized the value of this data mining (Summize at the time).

Actually, traffic is not free and to get some on CabEasy.com I have to pay. If I had a CPL (cost per lead) of $1, whether it’s through affiliation partnerships, advertising on Google or Facebook, or automatic responses on Twitter, I would be ready to pay to use twitter’s service if it brings me (i.e. CabEasy) qualified traffic. That’s where I think twitter could go. And they just might.

There’s been a lot of ink on what Twitter should do, and I’m not gonna add to it. This is just a reaction - and my 2 cents - on TechCrunch’s article.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!